peter 1xbet sports betting Elgin, Ph.D.

Advisor:

John Uhlarik

Dissertation Title

Validating the User-Centered Hybrid Assessment Tool (User-CHAT): A comparative 1xbet sports betting evaluation.

Dissertation Abstract

1xbet sports betting practitioners need effective 1xbet sports betting assessment techniques in order to facilitate development of usable consumer products. Many 1xbet sports betting evaluation methods have been promoted as the ideal. Few, however, fulfill expectations concerning effectiveness. Additionally, lack of empirical data forces 1xbet sports betting practitioners to rely on personal judgments and/or anecdotal statements when deciding upon which 1xbet sports betting method best suits their needs. Therefore the present study had two principal objectives: (1) to validate a hybrid 1xbet sports betting technique that identifies important and ignores inconsequential 1xbet sports betting problems, and (2) to provide empirical performance data for several 1xbet sports betting protocols on a variety of contemporary comparative metrics. The User-C entered H ybrid A ssessment T ool (User-CHAT) was developed to maximize efficient diagnosis of 1xbet sports betting issues from a behaviorally-based perspective while minimizing time and resource limitations typically associated with 1xbet sports betting assessment environments. Several characteristics of user-testing, the heuristic evaluation, and the cognitive walkthrough were combined to create the User-CHAT. Prior research has demonstrated that the User-CHAT supports an evaluation within 3-4 hrs, can be used by individuals with limited human factors/1xbet sports betting background, and requires little training to be used competently, even for complex systems. A state-of-the-art suite of avionics displays and a series of benchmark tasks provided the context where the User-CHAT's performance was measured relative to its parent 1xbet sports betting methods. Two techniques generated comparison lists of 1xbet sports betting problems---user-testing data and various inclusion criteria for 1xbet sports betting problems identified by the User-CHAT, heuristic evaluation, and cognitive walkthrough. Overall the results demonstrated that the User-CHAT attained higher effectiveness scores than the heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough, suggesting that it helped evaluators identify many 1xbet sports betting problems that actually impact users, i.e., higher thoroughness, while attenuating time and effort on issues that were not important, i.e., higher validity. Furthermore, the User-CHAT had the greatest proportion of 1xbet sports betting problems that were rated as serious, i.e., 1xbet sports betting issues that hinder performance and compromise safety. The User-CHAT's performance suggests that it is an appropriate 1xbet sports betting technique to implement into the product development lifecycle. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.

Education

Ph.D., Psychology, Kansas State University, 2007